Framework main features

Most frameworks allow you to use domain-specific languages (DSLs) in order to build your applications. In particular, React has popularized the use of JSX for writing its components, while Ember utilizes Handlebars. Unlike HTML, these languages know how to read data variables, and this data can be used to streamline the process of writing your UI.

Angular apps often make heavy use of TypeScript. TypeScript is not concerned with the writing of user interfaces, but it is a domain-specific language, and has significant differences to vanilla JavaScript.

DSLs can't be read by the browser directly; they must be transformed into JavaScript or HTML first. Framework tooling generally includes the required tools to handle this step, or can be adjusted to include this step. While it is possible to build framework apps without using these domain-specific languages, embracing them will streamline your development process and make it easier to find help from the communities around those frameworks.

JSX, which stands for JavaScript and XML, is an extension of JavaScript that brings HTML-like syntax to a JavaScript environment. It was invented by the React team for use in React applications, but can be used to develop other applications — like Vue apps, for instance.

The following shows a simple JSX example:

const subject = "World";
const header = (
  <header>
    <h1>Hello, {subject}!</h1>
  </header>
);

This expression represents an HTML <header> element with an <h1> element inside. The curly braces around {subject} tell the application to read the value of the subject constant and insert it into our <h1>.

When used with React, the JSX from the previous snippet would be compiled into this:

const subject = "World";
const header = React.createElement(
  "header",
  null,
  React.createElement("h1", null, "Hello, ", subject, "!"),
);

When ultimately rendered by the browser, the above snippet will produce HTML that looks like this:

<header>
  <h1>Hello, World!</h1>
</header>

The Handlebars templating language is not specific to Ember applications, but it is heavily utilized in Ember apps. Handlebars code resembles HTML, but it has the option of pulling data in from elsewhere. This data can be used to influence the HTML that an application ultimately builds.

Like JSX, Handlebars uses curly braces to inject the value of a variable. Handlebars uses a double-pair of curly braces, instead of a single pair.

Given this Handlebars template:

<header>
  <h1>Hello, {{subject}}!</h1>
</header>

And this data:

{
  subject: "World";
}

Handlebars will build HTML like this:

<header>
  <h1>Hello, World!</h1>
</header>

TypeScript is a superset of JavaScript, meaning it extends JavaScript — all JavaScript code is valid TypeScript, but not the other way around. TypeScript is useful for the strictness it allows developers to enforce on their code. For instance, consider a function add(), which takes integers a and b and returns their sum.

In JavaScript, that function could be written like this:

function add(a, b) {
  return a + b;
}

This code might be trivial for someone accustomed to JavaScript, but it could still be clearer. JavaScript lets us use the + operator to concatenate strings together, so this function would technically still work if a and b were strings — it just might not give you the result you'd expect. What if we wanted to only allow numbers to be passed into this function? TypeScript makes that possible:

function add(a: number, b: number) {
  return a + b;
}

The : number written after each parameter here tells TypeScript that both a and b must be numbers. If we were to use this function and pass '2' into it as an argument, TypeScript would raise an error during compilation, and we would be forced to fix our mistake. We could write our own JavaScript that raises these errors for us, but it would make our source code significantly more verbose. It probably makes more sense to let TypeScript handle such checks for us.

As mentioned in the previous lesson, most frameworks have some kind of component model. React components can be written with JSX, Ember components with Handlebars, and Angular and Vue components with a templating syntax that lightly extends HTML.

Regardless of their opinions on how components should be written, each framework's components offer a way to describe the external properties they may need, the internal state that the component should manage, and the events a user can trigger on the component's markup.

The code snippets in the rest of this section will use React as an example, and are written with JSX.

Properties, or props, are external data that a component needs in order to render. Suppose you're building a website for an online magazine, and you need to be sure that each contributing writer gets credit for their work. You might create an AuthorCredit component to go with each article. This component needs to display a portrait of the author and a short byline about them. In order to know what image to render, and what byline to print, AuthorCredit needs to accept some props.

A React representation of this AuthorCredit component might look something like this:

function AuthorCredit(props) {
  return (
    <figure>
      <img src={props.src} alt={props.alt} />
      <figcaption>{props.byline}</figcaption>
    </figure>
  );
}

{props.src}, {props.alt}, and {props.byline} represent where our props will be inserted into the component. To render this component, we would write code like this in the place where we want it rendered (which will probably be inside another component):

<AuthorCredit
  src="./assets/zelda.png"
  alt="Portrait of Zelda Schiff"
  byline="Zelda Schiff is editor-in-chief of the Library Times."
/>

This will ultimately render the following <figure> element in the browser, with its structure as defined in the AuthorCredit component, and its content as defined in the props included on the AuthorCredit component call:

<figure>
  <img src="assets/zelda.png" alt="Portrait of Zelda Schiff" />
  <figcaption>Zelda Schiff is editor-in-chief of the Library Times.</figcaption>
</figure>

We talked about the concept of state in the previous chapter — a robust state-handling mechanism is key to an effective framework, and each component may have data that needs its state controlled. This state will persist in some way as long as the component is in use. Like props, state can be used to affect how a component is rendered.

As an example, consider a button that counts how many times it has been clicked. This component should be responsible for tracking its own count state, and could be written like this:

function CounterButton() {
  const [count] = useState(0);
  return <button>Clicked {count} times</button>;
}

useState() is a React hook which, given an initial data value, will keep track of that value as it is updated. The code will be initially rendered like so in the browser:

<button>Clicked 0 times</button>

The useState() call keeps track of the count value in a robust way across the app, without you needing to write code to do that yourself.

In order to be interactive, components need ways to respond to browser events, so our applications can respond to our users. Frameworks each provide their own syntax for listening to browser events, which reference the names of the equivalent native browser events.

In React, listening for the click event requires a special property, onClick. Let's update our CounterButton code from above to allow it to count clicks:

function CounterButton() {
  const [count, setCount] = useState(0);
  return (
    <button onClick={() => setCount(count + 1)}>Clicked {count} times</button>
  );
}

In this version we are using additional useState() functionality to create a special setCount() function, which we can invoke to update the value of count. We call this function inside the onClick event handler to set count to whatever its current value is, plus one.

Each framework offers a way to define styles for your components — or for the application as a whole. Although each framework's approach to defining the styles of a component is slightly different, all of them give you multiple ways to do so. With the addition of some helper modules, you can style your framework apps in Sass or Less, or transpile your CSS stylesheets with PostCSS.

All major frameworks provide mechanisms for handling dependencies — using components inside other components, sometimes with multiple hierarchy levels. As with other features, the exact mechanism will differ between frameworks, but the end result is the same. Components tend to import components into other components using the standard JavaScript module syntax, or at least something similar.

One key benefit of component-based UI architecture is that components can be composed together. Just like you can write HTML tags inside each other to build a website, you can use components inside other components to build a web application. Each framework allows you to write components that utilize (and thus depend on) other components.

For example, our AuthorCredit React component might be utilized inside an Article component. That means that Article would need to import AuthorCredit.

import AuthorCredit from "./components/AuthorCredit";

Once that's done, AuthorCredit could be used inside the Article component like this:

<Article>
  <AuthorCredit />
</Article>

Real-world applications can often involve component structures with multiple levels of nesting. An AuthorCredit component nested many levels deep might, for some reason, need data from the very root level of our application.

Let's say that the magazine site we're building is structured like this:

<App>
  <Home>
    <Article>
      <AuthorCredit {/* props */} />
    </Article>
  </Home>
</App>

Our App component has data that our AuthorCredit component needs. We could rewrite Home and Article so that they know to pass props down, but this could get tedious if there are many, many levels between the origin and destination of our data. It's also excessive: Home and Article don't actually make use of the author's portrait or byline, but if we want to get that information into the AuthorCredit, we will need to change Home and Article to accommodate it.

The problem of passing data through many layers of components is called prop drilling, and it's not ideal for large applications.

To circumvent prop drilling, frameworks provide functionality known as dependency injection, which is a way to get certain data directly to the components that need it, without passing it through intervening levels. Each framework implements dependency injection under a different name, and in a different way, but the effect is ultimately the same.

Angular calls this process dependency injection; Vue has provide() and inject() component methods; React has a Context API; Ember shares state through services.

In the context of a framework, a component's lifecycle is a collection of phases a component goes through from the time it is appended to the DOM and then rendered by the browser (often called mounting) to the time that it is removed from the DOM (often called unmounting). Each framework names these lifecycle phases differently, and not all give developers access to the same phases. All of the frameworks follow the same general model: they allow developers to perform certain actions when the component mounts, when it renders, when it unmounts, and at many phases in between these.

The render phase is the most crucial to understand, because it is repeated the most times as your user interacts with your application. It's run every time the browser needs to render something new, whether that new information is an addition to what's in the browser, a deletion, or an edit of what's there.

This diagram of a React component's lifecycle offers a general overview of the concept.

Just as with lifecycles, frameworks take different-but-similar approaches to how they render your applications. All of them track the current rendered version of your browser's DOM, and each makes slightly different decisions about how the DOM should change as components in your application re-render. Because frameworks make these decisions for you, you typically don't interact with the DOM yourself. This abstraction away from the DOM is more complex and more memory-intensive than updating the DOM yourself, but without it, frameworks could not allow you to program in the declarative way they're known for.

The Virtual DOM is an approach whereby information about your browser's DOM is stored in JavaScript memory. Your application updates this copy of the DOM, then compares it to the "real" DOM — the DOM that is actually rendered for your users — in order to decide what to render. The application builds a "diff" to compare the differences between the updated virtual DOM and the currently rendered DOM, and uses that diff to apply updates to the real DOM. Both React and Vue utilize a virtual DOM model, but they do not apply the exact same logic when diffing or rendering.

You can read more about the Virtual DOM in the React docs.

The Incremental DOM is similar to the virtual DOM in that it builds a DOM diff to decide what to render, but different in that it doesn't create a complete copy of the DOM in JavaScript memory. It ignores the parts of the DOM that do not need to be changed. Angular is the only framework discussed so far in this module that uses an incremental DOM.

You can read more about the Incremental DOM on the Auth0 blog.

The Glimmer VM is unique to Ember. It is not a virtual DOM nor an incremental DOM; it is a separate process through which Ember's templates are transpiled into a kind of "byte code" that is easier and faster to read than JavaScript.

As mentioned in the previous chapter, routing is an important part of the web experience. To avoid a broken experience in sufficiently complex apps with lots of views, each of the frameworks covered in this module provides a library (or more than one library) that helps developers implement client-side routing in their applications.

All applications benefit from test coverage that ensures your software continues to behave in the way that you'd expect, and web applications are no different. Each framework's ecosystem provides tooling that facilitates the writing of tests. Testing tools are not built into the frameworks themselves, but the command-line interface tools used to generate framework apps give you access to the appropriate testing tools.

Each framework has extensive tools in its ecosystem, with capabilities for unit and integration testing alike.

Testing Library is a suite of testing utilities that has tools for many JavaScript environments, including React, Vue, and Angular. The Ember docs cover the testing of Ember apps.

Here's a quick test for our CounterButton written with the help of React Testing Library — it tests a number of things, such as the button's existence, and whether the button is displaying the correct text after being clicked 0, 1, and 2 times:

import { fireEvent, render, screen } from "@testing-library/react";

import CounterButton from "./CounterButton";

it("Renders a semantic button with an initial state of 0", () => {
  render(<CounterButton />);
  const btn = screen.getByRole("button");

  expect(btn).toBeInTheDocument();
  expect(btn).toHaveTextContent("Clicked 0 times");
});

it("Increments the count when clicked", () => {
  render(<CounterButton />);
  const btn = screen.getByRole("button");

  fireEvent.click(btn);
  expect(btn).toHaveTextContent("Clicked 1 times");

  fireEvent.click(btn);
  expect(btn).toHaveTextContent("Clicked 2 times");
});

At this point you should have more of an idea about the actual languages, features, and tools you'll be using as you create applications with frameworks. I'm sure you're enthusiastic to get going and actually do some coding, and that's what you are going to do next!

• Previous
• Overview: JavaScript frameworks and libraries
• Next